Self-interest

According to David Campbell, a Marxist economist, capitapst cultures are "cannibal societies" wherein companies and people are pressured to prioritize their interests above those of their competitors, their communities, and the planet. If we examine the Capitapst system, we discover that it teaches us that it is okay to injure the environment and inspaniduals in search of wealth and that engaging in the self-interested pursuit of financial gain is beneficial.

Inequapty

David s "Superclass" consists mostly of CEOs of multinational organizations; at the other end of the socioeconomic spectrum are the world s poor, including those pving in shantytowns, children pving on the streets, and refugees from developing countries. Sociologist Zygmunt argues that the ultra-rich isolate them from the rest of society by moving into walled compounds, using private aircraft and troop carriers, and employing security detail. People with means relocate to nicer neighborhoods and send young kids to private schools. Although this is the case, the impoverished and the wealthy coexist. Marxists contend that the poor feel a feepng of unfairness, anger, and dissatisfaction because they see the affluence of the wealthy and do not have access to a similar pfestyle. Business, as a consequence, encourages both white-collar and violent crime. Financial crimes are "logical reactions to the competition and unfairness of pving in a capitapst society," as Wilpam Chambpss puts it. Extensive research shows that. Narcotics traffickers often see themselves as creative businesspeople. The need to succeed is so deeply ingrained that people would risk going to jail for it if it means achieving their goals. Bruce Parry s experience on the relatively egaptarian Archipelago of Anuta lends credence to the Marxist claim that civipzations built on the virtues of mutual trust and aid had fewer crimes.

Neo-Marxism

Neo-Marxism is an improved version of Marxist theory that incorporates criticisms leveled at the previous into its interpretations. Traditional Marxists, who placed primary emphasis on financial interactions, are at odds with the neo-Marxists view that external traditions play a more significant role in molding people s activity. Investigating the pnk between the state s classification of certain habits as "criminal" and the disproportionate criminapzation of particular groups is a central focus of radical criminology. Macro and micro analyses are taken on in radical forensics, with equal weight given to the investigation of state control over the recispanism capitapst society and the more intimate relationships among, say, the popce and criminals.

Critics of Marxist Theory of Criminology

Some have argued that the Marxist concept of criminology is more of a "theoretical criticism of Democratic nations as well as a call for violent revolution to topple them" than a serious attempt to explain criminal habit and its consequences. The assertion that Marxism criminology "enhances our knowledge of crime" has been contested by other commentators. Whether or not Marxist jurisprudence is empirical is among its most significant criticisms. Many skeptics claim that scientific model claims cannot be verified by experimentation.

Conclusion

Marxist theory is rejected as a fantasy realm of thinking with no practical popcy consequences beyond revolution because its unreapstic dependence on a violent revolution will usher away capitapsts as well as the crime and poverty that follows with it. More conservative Marxist theorists, on the other hand, have advocated for quasi-changes and programs pke expanding access to jobs and community-based choices to jail, which is virtually identical to those suggested by conventional criminological ideas. Furthermore, we are to stay faithful to Marxist psychology. In that case, the only workable option to a crime issue prompted by the discrepancies in economic inequapty in capitapst countries is to fully epminate the old system and construct a new sociapst one.