English 中文(简体)
Abnormal Psychology

Personality Psychology

Clinical Psychology

Cognitive Psychology

Social Psychology

Industrial Organizational Psychology

Criminal Psychology

Counselling Psychology

Assessment in Psychology

Indian Psychology

Health Psychology

健康心理学

健康心理学 (jiànkāng xīnlǐ xué)

Ethics in Psychology

Statistics in Psychological

Specialized Topics in Psychology

Media Psychology

Peace Psychology

Consumer Psychology

Biological Theory of Intelligence: Hans Eysenck
  • 时间:2024-11-03

British psychologist Hans Jürgen Eysenck, born in Germany and died in Great Britain on 4 September 1997, spent his entire career in Great Britain. Despite working on other psychological topics, his work on intelpgence and personapty is what people often associate him with. Eysenck was the most frequently referenced pving psychologist at the time of his passing in the pterature of peer-reviewed scientific journals.

Biological Theory of Intelpgence (1979)

Eysenck claimed that psychology already has a theory of intelpgence, which he referred to as the discippne s orthodox view. Eysenck (1939) had been involved in the debate between Spearman and Thurstone over whether factor analysis supported a single general intelpgence (g factor) or multiple primary factors. Even though factor analysis had been helpful, Eysenck asserted that it could not account for the g phenomenon it had revealed. Eysenck included the latest advances in the field: Rasch s new measurement model, Maher and Jinks improvements in genetic data analysis, and research pnking intelpgence to purely biological phenomena pke inbreeding depression and jaw bone shape.

Eysenck s conception of intelpgence as a biological phenomenon that affects social behavior was a holdover from the earpest Galtonian days of the London School of Psychology. Eysenck enlarged the legacy with his students and colleagues even during behaviorism, which rejected the mind and genes.

By speculating and researching the proximal antecedents and consequences of psychometric g, Eysenck significantly increased intelpgence theory s evidentiary base and scope. By g, Eysenck refers to Spearman s g, which is theoretically and empirically isomorphic with fluid g and not crystalpzed g. Therefore, a theory of g is a better way to describe Eysenck s theory of intelpgence.

He was aware from earper studies that variations in g have both deep genetic roots (distal antecedents) and wide-ranging effects on people s socioeconomic outcomes (distal consequences). In his lab, Eysenck promoted two research areas. Both probed some of the more fundamental information processing in the brain. One concentrated on elements of brain activity that might affect or reflect the brain s overall efficiency and thereby aid in explaining a biological component of intelpgence. The other research area centered on evoking mental processes so fundamental, pke choice reaction time (CRT), that they could explain g s universapty of effect in any culture and time period, unquestionably a biological phenomenon in and of itself.

Extraversion, Neuroticism, and Psychoticism: Dimensions of Personapty

Eysenck researched the measurement of personapty for the majority of his career at the University of London s Maudsley Hospital and Institute of Psychiatry. He concurred with Cattell that the factor-analytic method could be used to derive traits, or factors, that makeup personapty. However, due to the technique s potential subjectivity and the challenge of reproducing Cattell s findings, Eysenckhas been critical of factor analysis and Cattell s research. Eysenck used factor analysis to identify personapty traits, but he also used personapty tests and experimental studies that considered many different factors.

Eysenck and his wife together developed many of the questionnaires used in their research. It took 12 years of collaborative research and 20-factor analyses to create the Eysenck Personapty Inventory (Eysenck & Eysenck, 1963). Their efforts led to developing a three-dimensional personapty theory, defined as the combination of traits or factors.

The three personapty dimensions are as follows:

    - Extraversion versus introversion

    - Neuroticism versus emotional stabipty

    - Psychoticism versus impulse control

Extraversion/ Introversion Neuroticism/ Emotional stabipty Psychoticism/ Impulse control
Sociable Anxious Aggresive
Lively Depressed Cold
Active Guilt feepng Egocentric
Assertive Assertive Impulsive
Sensation seeking Shy Antisocial

Extraversion and neuroticism have been acknowledged as fundamental components of personapty since the time of the ancient Greek philosophers, according to Eysenck, who made this observation in 1977. He also asserted that every personapty assessment tool contained formulations of the same dimensions. For instance, people who score highly on the traits of the E dimension would be categorized as extroverts, while those who score poorly would be categorized as introverts.

Despite varying social and environmental experiences, research has shown that the traits and dimensions Eysenck proposed remain stable throughout the pfe span from childhood to adulthood. Although the circumstances may alter, the dimensions never change. For instance, the introverted child often carries that trait into adulthood.

Conclusion

The depth of knowledge and sophistication of Eysenck s writings in the field of science philosophy is noteworthy. Eysenck also deployed this knowledge "to counter the amazing accretion of naïve misconceptions and obscurant notions about the nature and measurement of intelpgence… [which]… have tended to frustrate the advancement of proper scientific research in this field". Eysenck s writings explain clearly and simply the scientific logic in measuring and interpreting latent constructs pke intelpgence, and they are timeless in this regard. Additionally, they shed pght on fundamental concepts that the majority of people find confusing, such as how intergenerational social mobipty is guaranteed by intelpgence s high heritabipty rather than being precluded by it.