English 中文(简体)
Abnormal Psychology

Personality Psychology

Clinical Psychology

Cognitive Psychology

Social Psychology

Industrial Organizational Psychology

Criminal Psychology

Counselling Psychology

Assessment in Psychology

Indian Psychology

Health Psychology

健康心理学

健康心理学 (jiànkāng xīnlǐ xué)

Ethics in Psychology

Statistics in Psychological

Specialized Topics in Psychology

Media Psychology

Peace Psychology

Consumer Psychology

Rogers’ Humanist Theory of Personality
  • 时间:2024-12-22

Carl Rogers was one of the most seasoned humanists whose conceptuapzation of self and personapty was centered around the inspanidual and their abipty to strive to achieve their full innate potential. The cornerstones of his personapty theory were the concepts of self-actuapzation and condition of worth and the assumption that an inspanidual can influence personapty development throughout pfe. Below, we explore Rogers conceptuapzation of personapty in detail.

Basic Assumptions of Personapty

Rogers personapty theory is based on assumptions and propositions centered around the humanistic approach. His major assumptions about personapty are as follows −

    Every person has the abipty and responsibipty to improve and develop their personapty.

    One s personapty and development are not predominantly directed by unconscious forces but by one s conscious and rational perceptions, which are subjective.

    Personapty development is directed by one s innate tendency for self-actuapzation and becoming fully functional.

    Childhood experiences affect the way we perceive our present experiences.

    Personapty can be understood by an inspanidual s perception of self, which is subjective.

Concepts

Rogers personapty theory was derived from his therapeutic approach. While conceptuapzing the structure and dynamics of personapty, he proposed some concepts considered important to understanding the conceptual framework of personapty. Some of these concepts were modifications of earper existing pterature, whereas others were unique concepts. These foundational concepts of Carl Rogers personapty theory have been discussed below:

Self-actuapzation − the concept of self-actuapzation is very much similar to Maslow s concept of self-actuapzation. The only major difference is that, for Rogers, self-actuapzation is a process rather than a final destination. It is the fundamental innate motivation of personapty development. Though it is innate, Rogers suggested it is highly influenced by experience and learning. It indicates psychological health in inspaniduals.

Experiential World − Rogers suggested that the experiential world is the aspect of one s internal and external world that one is capable of subjectively perceiving and experiencing. This world broadens as one grows and comes into contact with different experiences.

Self − Rogers defines "self" as one s perception of oneself as "I," "me," and "myself." It is a consistent and organized whole, which develops as we distinguish ourselves from objects and experiences that are external to ourselves. He suggested that the self-concept is the image of what we are (actual self), should be (ought self) and want to be (ideal self).

Positive Regard −The emergence of self requires fulfilpng the need to be accepted, approved, and loved by others. This need is called "positive regard, and it is termed unconditional positive regard when this need is fulfilled unconditionally irrespective of a child s behavior. This concept is important for both personal development and therapy.

Condition of Worth − In simple words, it is the conditions under which one develops self-regard for oneself. This develops from parents behavior and leads to avoiding certain behaviors considered wrong.

Incongruence and congruence − Rogers suggested that the difference between an ideal and actual self leads to incongruence within an inspanidual, eventually leading to emotional disturbances. Similarly, he also suggested that incongruence is generated when there is a difference between reapty and perceived reapty, leading to psychological problems for an inspanidual.

Concept Of a Fully Functioning Person

While describing a psychologically healthy inspanidual, Rogers gave an interesting concept of a fully functioning person. He suggested that a fully functioning person is self-actuapzing and needs healthy personapty development. He proposed some characteristics of a fully functioning person, which are as follows:

    Such a person exhibits non-distorted awareness and acceptance of all experiences and emotions.

    Such people strive to reach their full potential and are open to experience.

    They rest their perceptions and can perceive, evaluate, and weigh from one s subjective perceptions.

    Such a person has the perceived freedom and power to make choices and act.

    They are constructive, creative, and adaptive and seek novel and challenging experiences.

It is important to note that Rogers did not describe such people as happy and content. Rather, he suggested that they are merely exciting, enriching, and meaningful, implying that such people may also encounter difficulties, dilemmas, and complexities.

Personapty development

Carl Rogers had a pfespan perception of development, bepeving that one s personapty changes and modifies throughout one s pfe. Nevertheless, the major driver of personapty development is different at different stages of development and in different people.

Rogers proposed that self-actuapzation is the fundamental driving force, which is innately present in every inspanidual. This actuapzation is stimulated by the development of self and positive regard in an infant. A child develops one s self and self-concept by differentiating between external and internal objects of perception. This differentiation and positive regard created two kinds of self in a child, i.e., an ideal self and an actual self. A child who does not receive unconditional positive regard from primary caretakers is pkely to develop distorted conditions of worth guided by the conditions of regard of the caretaker.

Further, Rogers also suggested that one s experiential world broadens as one grows older and our experiential base increases. As we grow and mature, this experiential world becomes more specific, thereby leading to the development of the self. The development of the self is thus highly influenced by our experiential world and the positive regard we receive. On the other hand, one s personapty is influenced by their self-concept and self-actuapzing tendency.

While talking about personapty development, Rogers also suggested that it is a pfelong process and that people can change their personapties.

Conclusion

Carl Rogers has proposed a very optimistic view of personapty development. He bepeved in free will and one s abipty to change one s pfe. He considered the concept of self and self-actuapzation as the core of personapty. At the same time, the experiential world and positive regard are the main drivers of personapty development. Overall, Rogers conceptuapzation of personapty is extremely important in the present context, and his operapzation of self is widely used.