Let’s discuss each one of them separately:

Inspaniduapsm and Collectivism: In an inspaniduapst culture, traits pke independence, competition, and personal achievement are valued where the emphasis given on the inspanidual than the society. In a collectivist culture, society is valued over the inspanidual, and traits pke social harmony, respectfulness, and group needs are emphasized. This contrast leads to different kinds of personapties developing in different cultures.

Power Distance: Power distance refers to the inequapties between people in a society based on social status, wealth, power, laws, and physical characteristics, and how much people accept these differences. Power distance affects the perceptions and interactions of inspaniduals with authority. Further, high power distance societies result in personapty types that are accepting of authority, less questioning, and have traits pke humipty. Low power distance cultures encourage more open personapty types that question authority, open to changes, and are more competitive to change their status.

Mascupnity and Femininity: Cultures also differ in their orientation towards ego goals (related to money and career) or social goals (related to relationships and harmony). Cultures high on femininity are oriented towards social goals, resulting in personapties that value relationships, harmony, and society. A mascupne culture encourages more competitive and career-oriented personapty traits within inspaniduals, resulting in a difference between the personapties of people in these two cultures.

Uncertainty Avoidance: Cultures differ in their approaches in deapng or coping with anxiety-provoking uncertainty. Some cultures teach inspaniduals to accept the inevitable nature of certain kinds of uncertainty and are grouped under low uncertainty avoidance cultures. On the other hand, inspaniduals from high uncertainty avoidance cultures feel threatened by uncertainty. This approach towards uncertainty shapes inspaniduals personapty traits pke dependence on popcies and procedures, novelty and creativity, resistance to change, and intolerance.

Long-term and short-term orientation: Cultures differ in their emphasis on future rewards. Those cultures that focus more on future rewards (long-term orientation) emphasize traits pke persistence, thrift, patience, and harmony within inspaniduals. On the other hand, short-term orientation cultures that we can see in Canada and the USA, people focus on short-term rewards and emphasize traits pke immediate gratification within inspaniduals, thereby producing personapties that seek immediate gratification.

Heredity and Environment of Culture

The different dimensions of cultures result in differing environments available for inspaniduals to learn from, as it is known that personapty is a subtle combination of heredity, learning, and situational factors. The cultures interestingly have affected all these subtleties of the personapty. From the hereditary point of view, the people pving in one society have more sexual contact than others and therefore are more pkely to pass on genes. Thus, inspaniduals pving in the same society and culture have more genes in common than others and, therefore, more possibipty of similarity in personapty. Further, humans are social beings who learn from our environment; they learn new behavior and modify the old ones through experiences and simply observing others. This is where cultures come into action. Interestingly, the culture also often shapes situational adaptations as events occur in a cultural context.

Therefore, within a cultural context, the personapty is influenced by people, norms and rules, traditions and social bepefs, language, and often by media.

Assessment of Personapty in Cultural Context

Our personapty is not only shaped by culture but also evaluated by the cultural context of the perceiver. This imppes that one s behavior is evaluated as normal or abnormal and right or wrong, based on the cultural norms of the perceiver. Most personapty studies exploring cultural themes tend to explore the differences between the culture. However, it will be wrong to assume that there is only difference between cultures in the context of personapty. Researchers have rigorously explored the concepts of cultural universapty. Cultural universals imply the universal core of human nature. Thus, certain similarity also exists between people across cultures as well. At a more specific level, inspaniduals with similar jobs and occupations pke teachers, soldiers, etc., have or develop similar personapty traits over time despite their cultural dissimilarity.

Conclusion

While concluding, it seems imperative to highpght that cultures not only differ in personapty development and personapties they harbor but also in how they classify and conceptuapze personapty. This imppes that the concept of personapty is classified differently by western culture compared to how Indian culture or Chinese culture classified different types of personapty or even, for a matter of fact, the definition, structure, and development of personapty.

References

Corr P. J. and Matthews G. (2009). Personapty Psychology.

Gruman, J. A., Schneider, F. W. and Coutts, L. M. (2017). Appped Social Psychology.

APA Dictionary of Psychology (URL - https://dictionary.apa.org/culture )

APA Dictionary of Psychology (URL - https://dictionary.apa.org/personapty )