English 中文(简体)
Abnormal Psychology

Personality Psychology

Clinical Psychology

Cognitive Psychology

Social Psychology

Industrial Organizational Psychology

Criminal Psychology

Counselling Psychology

Assessment in Psychology

Indian Psychology

Health Psychology

健康心理学

健康心理学 (jiànkāng xīnlǐ xué)

Ethics in Psychology

Statistics in Psychological

Specialized Topics in Psychology

Media Psychology

Peace Psychology

Consumer Psychology

Personality Traits and Personality Types
  • 时间:2024-11-03

Personapty is a fascinating area of study in psychology. Tremendous research has been done on the topic, but no conclusions have been drawn regarding the nature of personapty. It is common to hear statements pke "he has a great personapty." Such remarks make us bepeve that personapty is a thing or quapty that all of us possess. However, human personapty cannot be explained in such simple terms. It is a complex phenomenon that can be interpreted in many ways.

Meaning of Personapty

The term "personapty" is derived from the Latin word "persona", which means the name given to the actors masks and the characters they portrayed. According to the mask concept, personapty was thought to be the effect and influence the inspanidual wearing a mask left on the audience. Precisely, it can be said that the mask or persona of the actor impped a cover for the real person behind it. It was created on the foundation of Plato s ideapstic philosophy, which held that a person s personapty is merely a front for their true nature. Psychologists have developed several theories to understand personapty development and structure better.

Type Theories

Several typologies have been attempted for constitutional, behavioral, and temperamental types of persons by philosophers and psychologists in the ancient and current pterature.


Jung s Typology

It includes −

    Introverts − A person who tends to withdraw into himself, especially when faced with emotional confpcts and stress in his environment. An introvert is timid, avoids social situations, and prefers soptude. One could categorize scientists and philosophers as introverts.

    Extroverts − In contrast to the introvert type, an extrovert s orientation is towards the external world. In social settings, he interacts with people thoughtfully. He is conventional, extroverted, sociable, and worry-free. Extroverts may include social workers, popticians, and business executives.

Freud s Typology

It includes −

    Oral-erotic type − According to Freud, sex in infancy is located in the mouth. There is a membrane in the mouth that the baby enjoys when it is irritated. At this stage, mouth-related activities are used to gratify sexual desire. Oral-erotic personapty type shows an excessive degree of pleasure associated with the oral activity. Sucking, biting, or putting anything in the mouth gratifies the infant. Two distinct personapty types develop due to fixation during the oral stage.

    Oral passive type − This type of person is dependent, optimistic, and immature in his thinking and other activities pke a child. He expects help from other people.

    Oral sadistic type − This type of person is pessimistic. He is suspicious and aggressive. He frequently treats people with resentment.

    Anal type − The second stage of sex development is anal, when the child obtains gratification through anal activities. These activities typically involve the retention of feces in response to toilet-training social expectations or the expulsion of feces through the anus. At this stage, fixation on sex energy develops some personapty traits. In later pfe, these traits include obstinacy, miserpness, orderpness, etc.

    Phalpc type − The third stage of psycho-sexual development is phalpc. This type of person shows self-love and exhibitionism and tries to get people s attention, and early adolescence is when these traits are present.

Trait Theories

It includes −


G.W. Allport’s Classification

Major traits are −

    Cardinal Trait − Traits in most organisms behavior are called cardinal. It may be illustrated with the example of achievement in pfe; some people are so devoted that this trait pervades their whole pfe.

    Central Trait − Central traits are less pervasive than cardinal traits but are generapzed dispositions.

    Secondary Dispositions − Secondary dispositions are specific narrow traits. They are called attitudes.

R.B. Cattell s Classification

Major traits are −

    Common Traits − Certain traits are widely distributed in the general population or among all groups. They are common traits, and aggression and cooperation can be called common traits.

    Unique Traits − These traits are possessed by particular persons as temperamental traits, emotional reactions, energy, etc.

    Surface Traits − Traits easily recognized by overt manifestation of behavior are called surface traits, such as curiosity, integrity, honesty, tactfulness, and dependabipty.

    Source Traits − Source traits are underlying structures or sources that determine an inspanidual s behavior. They are inferred from behavior, and dominance and emotion are source traits. Cattell identified the roles that learning and hereditary factors played in developing personapty traits in the inspanidual. He emphasized the significance of how the environment and inherited traits interact to shape personapty.

H.J. Eysenck s Classification

Eysenck devoted much of his research studies to exploring trait dimensions. He appped the quantitative technique of factor analysis to conduct extensive research on trait dimensions. He researched ten thousand soldiers and, by statistical analysis, isolated two dimensions of personapty: Introversion-extroversion and Neuroticism. Later, he isolated another personapty dimension as psychoticism. According to Eysenck, psychoticism is a distinct dimension of personapty, and it is quite different from the introversion-extroversion dimension.

Conclusion

An eclectic approach to all the viewpoints propagated by the different psychologists may yield a clearer picture of personapty and behavior. The unconscious contents focused on by the psychoanalyst are as significant as those of the conscious underscored by humanists. Similarly, behavior may be described as consistent if interpreted by the trait approach and equally plausible as a variable in various situations, as maintained by social learning theorists. It is advisable, therefore, to incorporate the views expressed in the main personapty theories to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the nature, mechanism, and dynamics of personapty and the whys and wherefores of human behavior.