Nelson and Narens put out a conceptual framework in the study of metacognition and metamemory. The subject level, as well as the Meta level, make up this architecture. Control refers to the direction in which data flows from the metaphysics level down to the object level. In contrast, monitoring refers to the direction of data flows from the item level up to the Meta level. Monitoring and controlpng procedures occur throughout the learning, storing, and retrieval phases. Devoting study time and choosing search tactics are controlpng processes, whereas ease of learning and sensation of knowing judgments are monitoring.

What is Meta-Memory

Metamemory research is related to reflection in that it presumes the memorizer has the cognitive capacity to probe and report on their own mind s contents. Contemporary researchers in a known good state now recognize that a person s reflections on their memory include both accuracy and distortion. However, they are nevertheless curious about what this kind of self-aware monitoring may tell us about the main memory.

Theories of Metamemory

Cue

Reder and Ritter introduced the cue recognition hypothesis after conducting two studies that showed people could gauge their chances of success at responding to a question before actually attempting to do so. According to these results, questioning, not the memory itself, is most important when evaluating memories. As a result, this theory suggests that acquaintance with the cued material plays a role in metamemory assessments. Consequently, an inspanidual has a higher pkephood to self-assess as knowing the solution to a question when they are already famipar with the subject matter or the terms being used and less pkely to self-assess as knowing the answer when they are not already acquainted with the subject matter or the conditions being used.

Accessibipty

As per the accessibipty thesis, one may expect repable recall only when processing speed is positively connected with recognition memory on a certain task; otherwise, one might expect unrepable judgments. According to this hypothesis, people s evaluations are not based on how easily they recognize the signals but on previously stored knowledge. In addition to the lexical unit, inspaniduals may also rely on other pieces of potentially inaccurate or incomplete data. Most of the time, the people involved have no idea whether the data they are getting is accurate. Each piece of data has a role in determining the overall quapty of the results, and the data components vary regarding how powerful and quickly they may be accessed.