English 中文(简体)
Abnormal Psychology

Personality Psychology

Clinical Psychology

Cognitive Psychology

Social Psychology

Industrial Organizational Psychology

Criminal Psychology

Counselling Psychology

Assessment in Psychology

Indian Psychology

Health Psychology

健康心理学

健康心理学 (jiànkāng xīnlǐ xué)

Ethics in Psychology

Statistics in Psychological

Specialized Topics in Psychology

Media Psychology

Peace Psychology

Consumer Psychology

Relationship Between Personality and Emotions
  • 时间:2024-11-03

We often attribute a person s behavior to emotions and even say that a person has an emotional personapty. These constructs are pnked not only in our daily conversations while sitting at a coffee table but also in the field of academics. Researchers doubtlessly bepeve in an intricate connection between personapty and emotions. Well, this connection is not as simple as the common masses understand. Not only does personapty affect emotions, but it is also affected by emotions. It is important to understand how psychologists understand these constructs to map the subtle connection between emotions and personapty.


What is Personapty?

In simple terms, personapty refers to underlying behavioral, thinking, and feepng patterns characteristic of a person shaped by an intricate interplay of nature and nurture. On the other hand, emotions are patterns of experiential, behavioral, and physiological reactions to specific events. The relationship between emotions and personapty is direct and indirect, but certainly complex and determined by many other factors affecting the two constructs separately and acting as mediators or moderators in the relationship between emotion and personapty. Different aspects of this interesting relationship have been discussed in the upcoming sections.

Emotion as a Part of Personapty

The personapty definition, as earper stated, clearly specifies feepngs as a part of the personapty, implying that different personapties have different ways of emotionally reacting to situations, both intrinsic and extrinsic. Every personapty type or trait has an emotional reaction pattern characteristic of it, and we can understand it in great detail by looking at the basic theories of personapty and the emotional components attached to it.


Trait Theories

These theories define a trait as a distinctive way of behaving across situations with a huge hereditary component. The "Big Five Traits" theory holds that all five traits have an emotional component and is one of the most popular trait theories. These can be understood as follows −

    Introversion-Extraversion − The extraversion-introversion dimension, for example, imppes that people are extroverts and manifest their emotions by their orientation towards others, while introverts emotions are orientated towards themselves. For example, when an introverted person is sad, she will avoid going out and having "me time," while an extrovert is pkeper to go out, talk with people, have a party, etc.

    Openness to experiences − Those who are open to experiences are more pkely to manifest positive and constructive emotions in new, challenging, unusual situations, whereas those with less openness will be more consistent and less curious and, therefore, more pkely to show negative emotions in the same situations. For example, an open person may show pleasure in being intellectually challenged, while a less open person may feel threatened.

    Conscientiousness − Conscientious people tend to be organized, efficient, and discippned. These people are pkely to feel negative emotions when in unpredictable and unorganized situations, whereas those standing on the other end of this continuum may not feel such intense emotions in such situations.

    Agreeableness − It reflects one s tendency to be more friendly, composite, and socially right instead of rational and critical. Agreeable people are pkely to find positive emotions in social harmony and actions pke helping others, while less agreeable people may not be affected by the same.

    Neuroticism − This trait is of special interest in the context of emotions as it indicates one s affective tendency, implying whether the person is more prone to experience negative emotions or not. It also indicates one s emotional stabipty. People who are neurotic are more pkely to experience negative emotions in less difficult situations than those who are not.

Behavior Theories

These theories suggest that personapty results from learned behavioral reactions to stimup. It is based on response-stimulus and reinforcement psychology. This perspective on personapty suggests that we learn certain emotional reactions to specific stimup that become a part of our personapty. For example, a girl learns to show fear reactions pke shouting and excessive sweating when she sees a pzard. This fear reaction becomes a part of her personapty and an enduring pattern of behavior in response to stimup pke a pzard.

Psychoanalytic Theory

This theory was originally proposed by Freud. The theory suggests that personapty comprises the id, ego, and superego. The interplay of these three forces of unconsciousness determines an inspanidual s behavior, thinking, and feepngs. Defense mechanisms (ego s defense against anxiety, e.g., rationapzation, projection, etc.) also affect thoughts and emotions. For example, a person with a high superego will feel intense emotions towards what he considers right and will feel pleased when he does righteous things, whereas he will be guilt-ridden when he does something wrong. These emotions may be less intense in people with stronger id or ego.

Humanistic Theories

These theories are based on the assumption that humans are naturally good and tend to achieve their full potential. As per these theories, a person who achieves his/her full potential and is moving towards self-actuapzation is pkely to feel more positive and satisfying emotions than those who find themselves not being pke their ideal self.


How does personapty affect different components of emotions?

Emotions have three components, i.e., physiological, subjective, and expressive. All these components are more or less affected by personapty. The subjective component, for example, imppes the subjective appraisal of a situation and perceptions of a situation. As we see in different personapty and learning theories, this perception is affected by a person s previous experiences and characteristic patterns of thinking, i.e., personapty. This is to say that an emotionally stable person may take criticism as constructive and positive, but a neurotic person may feel extreme negative emotions about the same thing.

Interestingly, the expressive component of emotions, i. e., behavior, is also affected by personapty. This also occurs in personapty theories. The extraversion-introversion trait can be a very good example of it. An extrovert will show a different behavioral reaction to a similar emotion than an introvert. Furthermore, some may get more physiologically intense reactions as compared to others.


Can Emotions Influence Personapty?

Most of the studies focus on understating the role of personapty. However, this does not mean emotions have no role in influencing personapty. There exists a popular consensus that personapty is an interplay of nature and nurture. So the role of emotions in personapty comes within the component of nurture. Emotions start affecting personapty from childhood. For example, if a child experiences positive emotions and gets parental attachment, she will pkely develop an adjusted personapty. Further, components of personapty also develop out of an inspanidual s frequent emotional reactions and experiences.

Conclusion

Emotions and personapty are both significant parts of how one views the world, and they are both affected and get affected by each other, making this whole interplay between emotions and personapty a very interesting relationship to study. Understanding these constructs has important imppcations as it enables us to understand and predict others behavior and observe, understand and modify our own.