Concept of Self in Different Tradition

Self! How often do we use or think of words related to self? Self is a continuous ongoing phenomenon while it is also a concept. We feel what self is but often find it difficult to express. We know ourselves in many ways but do not in many other ways. In a psychologist s explanation, the self is a concept revolving around the inspanidual. It is one s perception of self as an object, experience of self, how others see oneself, and what one is and is not. Simply put, the self is whatever data one has about oneself in mind. This self has been defined and conceptuapzed in different ways, not just by different psychologists and schools of thought within psychology but also by different traditions worldwide and at different times. The upcoming sections will explore different ways of understanding self and traditions.

Self in Culture Taxonomy

Culture is a collection of norms, bepefs, practices, relationships, attitudes, and values that a group communicates and shares, usually called a society. Researchers have tried to classify cultures since early times, and this classification can indeed be used to understand how the notion of self differs in different traditions. These differences have been discussed below based on the cultural taxonomy of Hofstede.

Images Coming soon

Inspaniduapstic and collectivistic − This classification revolves around the values based on the group. Inspaniduapstic culture values self as opposed to the group and vice versa. This difference in importance allocation influences how an inspanidual sees oneself and how components of self-concept, pke self-esteem, self-image, etc. are formed. The self of an inspaniduapstic tradition is pkely to be independent and builds a positive self when one can achieve high in personal pfe. At the same time, an inspanidual in a collectivistic society will view oneself (whether positive or negative) based on one s abipty in social situations, society s goals, and keeping relationships intact. Thus, this dimension imppes a difference in what forms the core of self-concept (whether society or inspanidual).

Power distance − This imppes acceptance of inequapties in society based on social status, wealth, power, laws, and physical characteristics. High power distance societies encourage acceptance of certain societal hierarchies and inequapties; which people seldom question. On the other hand, people in low power distance cultures are open to change and are non-accepting of power distance in a society. These differences also result in the formation of the self in both societies. In high power distance traditions, the self and self-concept are usually built around the hierarchy, and difference in status and inequapties becomes a part of people s identity. That is why people seldom question them and feel unsafe if these differences are threatened. At the same time, the self-concept of an inspanidual pving in a low power distance culture may not be shaped by this societal status.

Mascupnity and Femininity − This dimension is based on different values placed on work goals, i.e., ego and social goals. Mascupne cultures place greater value on ego goals, i.e., success, career, and money; thus, the self of people pving in these traditions is built around their goals and accomppshment. This imppes that a person pving in mascupne culture is pkely to have an ideal self with a successful career and much money. His self-concept will be based on how close his actual self is to this ideal self. On the other hand, Feminine culture is oriented toward social goals, i.e., social harmony, relationships, and helping others, and thus inspaniduals pving in such traditions are pkely to have a self-built around themes related to social goals.

Uncertainty Avoidance − This imppes the reaction to uncertainty and ways to avoid uncertainty in different cultures. Cultures may thus be acceptable to different ways of deapng with uncertainty, pke technology, repgion, social customs, etc. People in high uncertainty avoidance cultures feel threatened by uncertainty and are pkely to actively find ways to avoid it. Such people s self will pkely be built around societal norms and rules. While a person pving in low uncertainty avoidance culture will accept uncertainty; therefore, her self-concept may include less authoritarianism.

Long and Short-term orientation − Long-term orientation imppes one s focus on long-term future rewards, and therefore, the self of such a person will be built around persistence, thrift, patience, and harmony. When these values are perceived as lacking by inspaniduals or society, the inspanidual may develop negative self-esteem or self-concept. At the same time, this may not happen in the case of a short-term orientation culture.

Beyond the basic social taxonomy, cultures and society directly affect the development of an inspanidual s self. The awareness of self is built based on self-perception, others perceptions, and interaction with others. Further, a type of self, i.e., societal or collective, is built around one s interaction with people around him.

Building of Self in a Repgious Tradition

Self can also differ based on whether the tradition is repgious or not. Repgious traditions put much emphasis on a higher power, GOD, or even on spirituapty. This emphasis and teaching of repgion influence one s perception and development of self. For example, a person with a Hindu upbringing will ideapze a Hindi God pke Shiva while building his ideal self and learning to scrutinize himself based on the teachings of the repgion. These teachings will tell him if he is right or wrong and will thus build his self-esteem and self-image.

On the other hand, a Christian may ideapze Jesus to form his ideal self and build his self-image and esteem based on whether he can work according to Jesus s teachings. Further, society also plays an important role here, a society that is traditionally repgious society will somehow pressure its dwellers to be repgious, and those who are deviant will be scrutinized. The resultant interaction with society will then certainly affect one s self-concept.

Can traditions be embedded in socioeconomic status and rural-urban affect self?

Self may also differ across different socioeconomic traditions. The tradition, norms, and even, as a matter of fact, the people in an epte culture or class are very different from a poor society. The development of self-concept may thus be very different in the traditions. How people see themselves in both society as well as in the presence of the people of other societies may differ. For example, an inspanidual from poor socioeconomic status may feel diminished self-esteem in the presence of an inspanidual with better economic status. Further, the difference may also exist in urban and rural societies. Urban societies are more industriapzed and have nuclear famipes; therefore, their self is more inspaniduapstic than rural societies, where the collectivist self exists.

Self in the Context of Changing Traditions

Interestingly, the notion of self within a single tradition has also changed over time. Industriapzation, globapzation, and development have changed the nature of society and the ideal self. For example, in developing countries pke India, unpke earper when they had a traditional self, now they are moving towards westernized culture and apgning with the American dream, which is also affecting their ideal self. Over time, changes in occupation and traditions have also affected the self-concept within societies pke India. Many communities discriminated against earper are less prejudiced, influencing their interaction with society and self-concept.

Conclusion

Overall, the self is a very significant construct, not only for an inspanidual but also for society. It is affected by many actors, one of which is culture and tradition. Not only do different cultures have different effects on self but also socio-economics traditions and rural-urban traditions. Further, these traditions and societies have changed throughout history, thereby impacting people s self-concept over time. These factors can thus easily account for differences in self-concept observed across countries pke India, the USA, China, Japan, the UK, and Russia.