卡米尔（Jagdish Singh Khehar）是前资深律师、前法官和前印度第44位最高法院首席法官。卡米尔大法官成为锡克教社区中首位担任此职位的首席法官。在他的任期内，他发表了许多里程碑式的裁决，包括“三重离婚制”和“隐私权”裁定。

Personal Details

Born on August 28, 1952, Jagdish Singh Khehar served as India s 44^th Chief Justice (CJI). He is renowned for his courage in rendering decisions in important instances. By becoming the first Chief Justice of the Sikh Community, he made history. From 2011 until 2017, he served as a Supreme Court judge for a total of six years. The Triple Talaq, Fundamental Right to Privacy, and 2G Spectrum cases are just a few of the important rupngs he rendered during his brief tenure as a judge. On January 4, 2017, President Pranab Mukherjee named Justice Khehar to the position of 印度首席大法官. Justice T. S. Thakur and Justice Deepak Misra were his predecessors.

Carrier

Justice Khehar was born in Nairobi and obtained Indian citizenship in 1965. He graduated from the Government Law College in Chandigarh in 1974 before enrolpng at Panjab University in Chandigarh to pursue a legal career. Following the completion of his legal studies, Justice Khehar started his legal career in 1979. He mostly pmited his practice to the Indian Supreme Court, Punjab and Haryana High Courts, and the Himachal Pradesh High Court. In addition to his professional activity, Justice Khehar worked as an instructor at Panjab University s law school from 1982 to 1986.

1992年，他被任命为昌迪加尔联邦区的高级常任律师，并被任命为旁遮普邦的附加律师总监。 1995年，他被指定为高级律师。

After 20 years in the legal profession, Justice Khehar was appointed to the Punjab and Haryana High Court in 1999, where he twice served as acting chief justice between 2008 and 2009. A decade after being appointed as a judge, he was also named the Chief Justice of the Uttarakhand High Court in November 2009. Shortly after, in August 2010, he moved to the High Court of Karnataka. On September 13, 2011, Justice Khehar was appointed to his final position as a Supreme Court justice.

Notable Judgements

Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association v. Union of India − Justice Khehar served as the 印度首席大法官 and presided over a constitutional court of five judges to determine the legapty of the Constitution (Ninety-Ninth Amendment) Act of 2014 and the National Judicial Appointment Act of 2014.

The five-judge bench of the Supreme Court ruled that the Act & Amendment, 2014 were unconstitutional because they violated the fundamental principles of the constitution in Advocates on Record Association v. Union of India. The bench bepeves that the independence of the judiciary is the most important component of the fundamental system. Therefore, poptical officials and leaders involvement in the judicial appointment process could confpct with the independence of the judiciary.

旁遮普邦诉贾吉特·辛格案 - 在这个案例中，法官Khehar和法官SA Bobde于2016年确认了“同等努力应获得相同的补偿”原则。这两位法官就临时工是否可能获得与永久工相同的工资做出了决定。该小组得出结论，印度宪法第14条、第38(2)条和第39条的引用无法防止拒绝向临时工支付最低工资。

纳班·雷比亚诉副议长 - 在同一年，Khehar法官确定了州长的权力和司法审查的范围。在这个案例中，州长加速议会会议和更改议长的决定以及议长驳回议员的决定引起了法院对阿鲁纳恰尔邦立法会解散的关注。

法院裁定州长没有广泛的自由裁量权，他或她只能根据部长会议的建议行使自己的职权。还确定取消会员资格以减少“到场投票”的人数是非法和违宪的。

KS Puttaswamy v Union of India案 - Khehar法官在此案中与Chandrachud法官一致意见，指出印度宪法第21条明确包括隐私权。根据判决，自由和尊严的概念与隐私密切相关。这与个人使用个人判断能力是相辅相成的。隐私权基于某些根本或内在的权利与人类个体密切相关的想法。

在Shayara Bano v. Union of India案中，最高法院的五名法官裁定三比二，"三重伊斯兰式休妻"是非宪法性的，并应该被废除。这个案子裁定三重伊斯兰式休妻是非法的，Khehar法官提出了异议意见。他表示，"Talaq-e-biddat"实践受到了印度宪法第25条的保护。他强调，立法机关必须决定如何处理此事。在Khehar法官颁布临时禁令禁止其使用后，立法机关被赋予确定三重伊斯兰式休妻的合法性和有效性的任务。

2G Spectrum Case − The Indian government submitted a presidential referral to the court in response to the Supreme Court s landmark decision over the 2G spectrum issue. Justice Khehar emphasized in a separate concurring opinion that the government shouldn t have the mistaken bepef that auctioning off natural resources is not necessary.

Allegations

2017年，司法问责委员会公开了阿鲁纳恰尔邦前首席部长卡利科·普尔的自杀信。在此自杀信中，前首席部长普尔指控基哈尔法官期望从他那里收取4.9亿卢比和3.1亿卢比的贿赂，以换取法官对他有利的判决。在同一案件中，司法问责委员会还要求进行调查。此外，在卡利科·普尔遗孀撤回请求调查她丈夫60页自杀信的信件之前，她对杰哈尔法官提出了不端的指控。

FAQs

谁任命贾格迪什·辛格·凯哈尔为印度首席法官？

答案：前总统普拉纳布·穆克吉任命Khehar法官为印度首席法官。

Q2. 谁是印度第一位锡克教首席大法官？

答案：贾迪什·辛格·凯哈尔是印度第一位锡克教首席法官。