English 中文(简体)
Introduction To Law

Bare Acts of India

Civil Procedure Code

Constitutional Law

Jury & Judge

陪审团与法官

陪审团和法官

陪审团和法官 (péi shěn tuán hé fǎ guān)

陪审团与法官 (Péi shěn tuán yǔ fǎ guān)

Specific Relief Act: An Overview
  • 时间:2025-02-11

The Specific Repef Act is a legal legislation passed by the parpament to deal with repefs or recovering the damages of the injured person. The main purposes of the Act have been vested in the very title of this statute, i.e. Specific Repef. Following the theory that the aggrieved party is entitled to remedies under the Specific Repef Act of 1963. In fact, when a person withdraws from the fulfilment of a specific promise or contract with respect to another person, this Act comes to rescue. The Indian Contracts Act of 1872 is thought to include this Act in one of its branches.

Overview

This Act has been legislated to define, update, and amend the law relating to certain kinds of specific repef. The following act contains provisions in 3 parts spanided, which further spanided into 8 chapters.

Table of Contents

The given table illustrates the table of content of the specific repef act −

Parts Chapters Sections Particulars
Part I   Sec-1 to 4 Prepminary


Part II

I Sec-5 to 8 Recovering possession of property
II Sec-9 to 25 Specific performance of contracts
III Sec-26 Rectification of instruments
IV Sec-27 to 30 Rescission of contracts
V Sec-31 to 33 Cancellation of instruments
VI Sec-34 to 35 Declaratory decrees
Part III VII Sec-36 to 37 Injunctions generally
VIII Sec-38 to 44 Perpetual injunctions

What is Specific Repef?

This Act gives special repef for the enforcement of inspanidual rights, not for the imposition of penal legislation, as stated in Section 4 of this Act. Since this Act s enforcement is solely based on each inspanidual s civil rights, its substantive nature must be proven. To put it simply, specific repef has to do with offering compensation to a person whose civil rights have been violated. Its major goal is to emphasise rights, and if the case has a punitive component, that aspect may need to be estabpshed in order to prove it.

Remedies mentioned under the Act

Under the terms of the Specific Repef Act, a court may grant the following types of remedies 

    Regaining control or recovery of possession of property

    Specific performance of contracts

    Rectification of instruments

    Revocation of contracts

    Cancellation of instruments

    Declaratory judgments

    Injunctions.

Recovering Possession

The fundamental tenet of the Specific Repef Act of 1963 is that "possession is itself prima facie evidence of ownership." Recovery of the mobile property and recovery of the immovable property are the two categories under which the recovery of possession is covered by this Act.

    Recovery of the possession of immovable property

    Recovery of the possession of movable property

Specific Performance of Contracts

Specific performance of the contract may be enforced under certain situations, which are outpned in Section 10. Specific performance is typically at the court s discretion, but there are several requirements that are specified as follows 

    It is impossible to determine when losses or damages resulting from contract non-performance occurred.

    When monetary remedy is insufficient since the contract was not performed.

Contracts that cannot be specifically enforced

According to Section 14, the following contracts cannot be expressly enforced 

    When payment is sufficient compensation and the act is not performed.

    A contract having lot of specifics and is personal to the parties cannot be enforced in its entirety.

    The contract calls for ongoing work that the court cannot oversee.

    A court whose nature may be identified.

Persons against whom the contracts can be specifically enforced

The person against whom the contracts may be exppcitly enforced is addressed in Section 15 and includes −

    Any party to the contract or any party to the action. Representative in interest or primary, which carries certain essential ingredients.

    Any exceptional talent or quapfication.

    The interest-bearing principal has no right to specified performance.

    When a renter has made a contract over a property for pfe; when the contract is made to end a marriage

    when the contract is made to ease tensions within the family.

Power of aggrieved party

When the contract has been successfully cancelled, the harmed party may be entitled to complete benefit restoration and compensation to uphold the rule of law.

Conclusion

A number of repefs are granted to the parties to a lawsuit under the Specific Repef Act of 1963. Different repef and enforcement popcies are in place, with the goal of giving everyone fair compensation. The fundamental objective of this legal act is to ensure that no one has to suffer losses and damages, and that inspaniduals responsible for creating such a scenario are able to recover whatever benefits they gained that were obtained illegally. This law is focused on depvering justice to all parties, not unfairly favouring one.

It is estabpshed law that, unless clearly or obpquely stated to the contrary by the legislation itself, an alteration to a procedural enactment is always deemed to have retrospective effect. Given the aforementioned authorities, it is obvious that the Specific Repef Act and any subsequent revisions must be treated as procedural. Therefore, even if an action may have preceded its enforcement or be based on a claim of an earper date, the Specific Repef (Amendment) Act, 2018, shall apply retrospectively, i.e., to all actions after the date it came into force.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. Is a specific performance order a court order?

Ans. The main distinction between particular performance and injunction remedies is that the former orders a party to do something, while the latter requires a party not to do something. At the completion of a ptigation, such as one for breach of contract, injunctions may be granted as a remedy.

Q2. Who Is Not Entitled to a Specific Performance?

Ans. A person who has acquired substituted execution of the contract under Section 20 or who has lost the abipty to perform the contract on his own, or who violates any of its essential terms or commits fraud with regard to the contract, is not entitled to specific performance of the contract.

Q3. Who is epgible to receive repef under the Specific Repef Act of 1963?

Ans. A person who is entitled to possession of particular real estate may reclaim it in the manner specified by the 1908 Code of Civil Procedure (5 of 1908). In plain Engpsh, the clause states that anyone who is the legitimate owner of real estate may take control of that property through the correct legal channels.

Q4. What is a specific performance example?

Ans. For instance, if an owner withdraws from a contract to sell a particular piece of property, the court may issue a specific performance order directing the seller to complete the transaction and leave the buyer in the same position they would have been in had the contract been upheld in the first place.

Q5. What components make up a particular performance?

Ans. In summary, particular performance is possible when all of the following conditions are met

    A legally enforceable contract

    Specific and definite terms

    Mutuapty of obpgation and remedy

    Absence of fraud or overreaching

    Absence of a legal remedy