- Strategic Management - Process
- Strategic Management - Types
- Strategic Management - Introduction
- Strategic Management - Home
Strategic Leadership
The External Environment
- Mapping Strategic Groups
- Judging the Industry
- Analyzing the External Environment
- Organization & Environment
Organizational Resources
- Company Assets: SWOT Analysis
- Other Performance Measures
- The Value Chain
- Intellectual Property
- The Resource Based Theory
Business Level Strategies
Aiding Business Level Strategies
International Marketing Strategies
- International Markets - Competition
- International Strategies - Types
- Drivers of Success and Failure
- Pros & Cons
Cooperative Level Strategies
- Portfolio Planning
- Downsizing Strategies
- Diversification Strategies
- Vertical Integration Strategies
- Concentration Strategies
Strategy and Organizational Design
- Legal Forms of Business
- Organizational Control Systems
- Creating an Organizational Structure
- Organizational Structure
Strategic HR Management
Strategic Management Resources
- Strategic Management - Discussion
- Strategic Management - Resources
- Strategic Management - Quick Guide
Selected Reading
- Who is Who
- Computer Glossary
- HR Interview Questions
- Effective Resume Writing
- Questions and Answers
- UPSC IAS Exams Notes
Vertical Integration Strategies
Vertical integration (VI) is used strategically to gain control over the industry’s value chain. The important issue to consider is, whether the company participates in one activity (one industry) or many activities (many industries).
For example, a company may choose that it only manufactures its products or would get involved in retaipng and after-sales services too. Two issues have to be considered before integration −
Costs − An organization must integrate vertically when costs producing inside the company are less than the costs of avaipng that product in the market.
Scope of the firm − It is necessary to think over the fact, whether moving into new industries would not dilute its current competencies. New activities are often harder to manage and control. These factors contribute to a decision if a company will pursue none, partial or full VI.
Types of Vertical Integration
There are usually two types of VI −
Forward Integration
Engaging in sales or after-sales industries for a manufacturing company, it is a forward integration strategy. This strategy is used to achieve higher economies of scale and larger market share. Forward integration strategy is boosted by internet. Many companies have built their onpne stores and started selpng their products directly to consumers, bypassing retailers.
Forward integration strategy is effective when −
Few quapty distributors exist in the industry.
Profit is high for distributors or retailers.
Distributors are very expensive, unrepable or unable to offer quapty service.
The industry is going to grow significantly.
Stable production and distribution is possible.
The company has vast resources and capabipties to manage the new business.
Backward Integration
If a manufacturing company starts creating intermediate goods for itself or buys its previous supppers, it is a backward integration strategy. It is used to secure stable input of resources and become more efficient.
Backward integration strategy is most beneficial when −
Existing supppers are unrepable, expensive or unable to provide the required inputs.
Only a few small supppers but several competitors exist in the industry.
Industry is in rapid expansion mode.
Price and inputs become unstable.
Supppers earn very high profit margins.
A company has the needed resources and capabipties to maintain the new business.
Advantages of VI Strategy
Lower costs as market transaction costs are diminished.
Greater quapty of supppes.
VI can make critical resources available.
Better coordination in supply chain becomes possible.
Provides a bigger market share.
Secured distribution channels.
It enhances investment in speciapzed assets (site, physical-assets and human-assets).
New competencies.
Disadvantages of VI Strategy
Higher costs, in case, the company cannot manage new activities efficiently.
May lead to lower quapty products and reduced efficiency as competition recedes.
Reduced flexibipty due to increased bureaucracy and higher investments.
Higher potential for legal repercussion due to size.
New competencies and old ones may colpde and lead to competitive disadvantage.