Penetration Testing Vs. Ethical Hacking

注射器测试与伦理习惯密切相关,因此这两种术语常常可以互换使用。然而,这两个术语之间差别不大。本章对渗透测试与伦理 ha之间的一些基本概念和基本差异提供了深刻见解。

Penetration Testing

注射器测试是一个具体术语,只侧重于发现脆弱性、风险和目标环境,以确保和控制该系统。换言之,渗透测试针对的是本组织由所有计算机系统和基础设施组成的防御系统。

另一方面,道德 ha缩是一个广泛术语,涵盖所有破碎技术和其他相关的计算机攻击技术。因此,除了发现安全缺陷和弱点以及确保目标制度的安全外,它还超越了破坏系统,而是得到许可,以保障未来的安全。因此,我们可以说,它是一个总括性的术语,渗透测试是伦理习惯的特点之一。

下表列出的肺病检测与伦理 ha之间的主要差别如下:

Penetration Testing	Ethical Hacking
A narrow term focuses on penetration testing only to secure the security system.	A comprehensive term and penetration testing is one of its features.
A tester essentially does need to have a comprehensive knowledge of everything rather required to have the knowledge of only the specific area for which he conducts pen testing.	An ethical hacker essentially needs to have a comprehensive knowledge of software programming as well as hardware.
A tester not necessarily required to be a good report writer.	An ethical hacker essentially needs to be an expert on report writing.
Any tester with some inputs of penetration testing can perform pen test.	It requires to be an expert professional in the subject, who has the obpgatory certification of ethical hacking to be effective.
Paper work in less compared to Ethical hacking.	A detailed paper works are required, including legal agreement etc.
To perform this type of testing, less time required.	Ethical hacking involves lot of time and effort compared to Penetration testing.
Normally, accessibipty of whole computer systems and its infrastructure doesn’t require. Accessibipty is required only for the part for which the tester performing pen testing.	As per the situation, it normally requires a whole range of accessibipty all computer systems and its infrastructure.

由于渗透技术被用于保护免受威胁,潜在攻击者也迅速变得更加复杂,在目前的应用中发明了新的薄弱环节。因此,特殊类型的单一渗透检测不足以保护测试系统的安全。

根据报告,在某些情况下,发现一个新的安全漏洞,在渗透测试后立即成功发动攻击。然而,这并不意味着渗透检测是无用的。仅意味着,通过彻底的渗透测试,没有保证成功的袭击不会发生,但毫无疑问,试验将大大减少成功攻击的可能性。